• Home
  • Latest Writing
  • About
  • Book
  • Contact
Menu

KEN CHITWOOD

Religion | Reporting | Public Theology
  • Home
  • Latest Writing
  • About
  • Book
  • Contact
“The person who knows only one religion, knows none”
— Max Müller

Of Mountains, Mary, & Sacred Fire: Revivication of Indigenous Voices

October 13, 2014

Today is Columbus Day. For some, it is Indigenous Peoples Day.

While Stephen Colbert may joke about, and some may be honestly offended by, the re-appropriation of Columbus Day by indigenous peoples, the reality is that Native Tribes and indigenous organizations feel ostracized and offended by the holiday.

The movement to re-claim "Columbus Day" (associated with cultural extirpation and colonial hegemony) is part of a wider context of the revivification of indigenous voices across the Americas.

In a recently written paper I address three examples of the tension, transculturation, and tribal aspects of indigenous religious subversion: in the mountains of California, in the shrines of Central America, and on Lake Titicaca in Peru. Read the rest of the paper HERE.  http://

In PhD Work, Religious Studies Tags Stephen Colbert, Columbus Day, Indigenous Peoples Day, Indigenous religion, Virgin Mary, Transculturation, Tribes, Lake Titicaca, Fire ritual, Andean fire dance, Mt. Pinos, Chumash, New Age
Comment

Applying the Golden Circle to your Ministry

October 9, 2014

What if great organizations succeed by first attending to WHY they exist, then HOW they go about their mission, and then finally, WHAT they do to accomplish that mission? What if your product didn't matter as much the purpose and process behind it? It may sound like common sense, but what if you took this idea and applied it to the church? Does your ministry's music style matter? What about your website? Is the product the point or does something deeper draw people to dive in?

*Follow @Kchitwood on Twitter

In this post, I talk about Simon Sinek's "Golden Circle" proposal and how it explains that Apple Computers succeeds not because it produces the best tech product, but because it inspires consumers to buy into their story, their meta-narrative, their “why.” So goes the story with the Wright brothers who had zero funding and zip notoriety. Their competitor was the affluent newsmaker Samuel Langley. The Wright brothers beat Langley to be first in flight not because of what they had or how they did it, but because they had the belief, the creed, of the promise of flight.

How does this apply to your ministry? Click here to read more at FiveTwo.com

In Church Ministry, Missiology Tags FiveTwo, Golden Circle, Simon Sinek, Purpose, Product, Process, Why, How, What
Comment

That one time an ISIS supporter contacted me via Twitter

October 7, 2014

The other week I posted a piece on my blog and at Sojourners — a progressive Christian publication associated with the work of Jim Wallis — about why Westerners join ISIS. The piece focused on some of the more sociological reasons Westerners choose to connect to such an violent group. The piece attracted some critics. Most notably, an ISIS supporter contacted me on Twitter to let me know where I got it wrong. 

@DarAlHaq, who has an ISIS flag and symbol as his cover photo on Twitter and regularly posts photos and stories from the front in Syria and Iraq, told me, “the article doesn't give the reality of why a young western Muslims wants to leave the comfort.” Fair enough. This is my effort to share his views and problematize my previous presentation. 

Many politicians, pundits, and everyday people are wondering why Westerners are joining ISIS and the answer is not singular, static, or straightforward. Westerners, who some surmise make up a significant segment of ISIS’s some 20,000 - 40,000 fighters, are joining ISIS for various reasons, but three categories of thought are worth considering — the theological, the societal, and the sociological. 

*For more on religion & culture, follow @kchitwood

Theological

As I argued previously, there is a sense in which (no matter the political rhetoric) ISIS is Islamic. It is Islamic insomuch as ISIS’s leaders, and many of its outspoken supporters abroad, contextualize ISIS’s cause within a theological framework. 

Specifically, many media sources and ISIS spokespeople are explaining ISIS’s thought and action in terms of Salafism. Salafis are Islamic reformists who view their movement as a return to the roots, to the ways of the 'as-Salaf as-Saliheen', the first three generations of Muslims — the pious “predecessors” or “ancestors” of Islam. They hold to a literalist and individual interpretation of the Qur’an and Sunnah and a strict science of tawhid — the oneness of Allah. Their theological idealism leads them to contest and combat what they see as contaminated innovations (bida’) in Islam — such as veneration of saints, visiting graves, various forms of Sufism and Islamic mysticism, and even other Muslim schools of thought (an extreme view of taqfir, which leads ISIS to murder other Muslims they do not see as “pure” or “authentic” enough).

Salafis have a superiority complex, emerging from their understanding of their reform movement as a pure and perspicuous manifestation of Islam. As Roel Meijer said, “the basic power of Salafism lies in its capacity to say ‘we are better than you.’” This superiority bleeds not only into thoughts on theology, but also in terms of discourse and action. For Salafis, right thought must lead to right moral acts. Of course, not all Salafis are violent, but those who are — Jihadi-Salafists — theire superiority complex is on steroids because of the ultimate demands their philosophy makes of its adherents. This would be the case with ISIS fighters who go to Iraq and Syria and put their lives on the line for their brand of theology. 

Yet, to say ISIS Islam is too simplistic. There are too many other Muslim communities and expressions of glocal (localized forms of the one global faith) Islam throughout the world. Islam is a diverse global faith, which takes on a different form, with varying interpretations of the Qur’an and the tradition of Muhammad where the local Muslim community deals with dissimilar concerns about local realities and contrasting views on religious violence and Westernization. It is unsophisticated to simply posit that ISIS represents Islam or is Islamic in a general sense with no further discussion or clarification. As Alireza Doostdar shared via Sightings at the University of Chicago, not only is there great theological diversity within Islam in general, and Salafism in particular, but also within ISIS itself. Furthermore, he opined, “the view that one particular religious doctrine is uniquely extremist will not help us understand the cycles of brutality that have fed on years of circulating narratives and images of torture, violent murder, and desecration.” Theology alone does not explain the allure of ISIS.

Societal Ideology

This is where my Twitter pal @DarAlHaq comes in. His handle name means, “Land of Truth” or, perhaps, “Land of the Right” or “Land of God,” depending on the translation. He is, evidently, in search of the “Land of Truth” where he feels he can live out his faith without the corrupting influences of modern, Western, society. 

As Olivier Roy wrote we underestimate just how much Westernization contributes to the radicalization of Muslims and other extremists. @DarAlHaq is not alone in struggling with how to authentically practice (according to his view of what is “authentic”) his faith and remain pure in a context he is convinced is corrupting at its core. 

In response to why he thinks Westerners leave “comfort” to join ISIS where “death and constant war” are guaranteed, he said to me: 

these young [ISIS recruits] are fed up with [the] West and its lies, they don't want to see Muslims die and humiliated. They feel the [sense] of responsibility to protect them and free them from [the] hegemony of [the] U.S. and it’s corrupt agents and puppets who rule Muslims and plunder the little food they have left. They are sick and tired of western life. They are constantly bombard[ed] by prostitution, clubbing […]. The young muslims who knows their religion love to live a life of piety and faithful muslims, but the society they they live in is full of evil and that is [why] they seek salvation and join [a] group who truly believe in the same goal they want to establish a society where there is zero corruption, full of piety and [a] high standard of morals. These Islamic movements offer them a structural society where God[’s] words are above everything. They believe in the freedom of people, [but it has turned them] in[to] animals [who] have no second thought as to what the purpose of life is.

Because of this, he challenged, “we are eager to meet death, but what about you?”

@DarAlHaq’s sentiments echo a broader revitalized, and reformist, call from many Muslims whose lives are fragmented by Westernization. They see “the West” as responsible for immorality, widespread death, and a loss of purpose for life. Their ideological interpretation of Western society leads them to join groups like ISIS who, at the moment, are the foremost adversaries against “Western hegemony.” In this way, @DarAlHaq and others like him buy into the identity politics of Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations” binary between “Islam” and “the West.” In so doing, they mirror the multiculturalists and “Islamophobic networks” in “the West” who and form a strange partnership with them in promoting the idea that “authentic” Islam is not compatible with modernity and vice versa. 

In the past, those who wanted to join anti-Western movements would have become communists, joined leftist political or military organizations, neo-Nazi camps, or trained with al-Qaeda. Now, as ISIS seeks to establish an “Islamic state” in the Levant and the Middle East these young men and women fed up with “the West” join their ranks to combat the society they feel is degrading and destroying their lives. This sentiment is not necessarily Islamic, but could stem from various ideological sources including non-conformist sentiment, leftist creeds, or even Christian fundamentalism. Because of ISIS’s Islamic rhetoric it recruits Muslims, but any number of organizations opposing the “Western world” (notably, the anti-globalization camp) attract people from other backgrounds with similar attitudes toward the unethical lifestyle of “the West.” 

Sociological 

As I mentioned in my previous blogs, many Westerners also join ISIS for social reasons. Most notably, because they are isolated and lonely. In his book Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah, Olivier Roy says that in the passage to the West, Islam as a religion (and its practitioners) undergo a deterritorializing, deculturalizing, and destabilizing process that, both of us argue, leaves individuals feeling rejected not only by Western society (see above), but by their fellow Muslims. Thus, these isolated men and women go in search of a new ummah (global Islamic community, on the macro level) and a new local community (on the micro level). Enter ISIS. 

*To read more about this, read my previous blog, “Why do Westerners join ISIS?” 

This list of reasons why Westerners join ISIS is not comprehensive nor entirely cohesive. There are other reasons why Westerners leave their homes to fight in the deserts of Syria and Iraq alongside other ISIS recruits, ranging from the psychological to the criminal. Furthermore, our understanding of ISIS and its fighters is limited. My contact with @DarAlHaq is just an initial foray, but gaining further access is fraught with difficulty and danger. Thus, intimate knowledge of ISIS recruits’ motivations remains scant. Moreover, understanding why Middle Easterners join ISIS is an entirely different consideration, but I surmise that theological neofundamentalism, societal struggles related to the increased pressure of Westernization, and deculturalization, destabilization, and deterritorialization still play a significant role even there. 

Whatever the conclusions, the situation is complicated and in need of further investigation and fine-tuned perspectives that attempt to summarize the multifarious motivations for Westerners to join the ISIS cause. Without thoughtful and nuanced discussion we run the risk of oversimplifying ISIS and its philosophical compatriots, which inevitably leads to exacerbating the issue we set out to solve in the first place.

*For more on religion & culture, follow @kchitwood.

In PhD Work, Religion, Religion and Culture, Religion News Tags ISIS, Why do people join ISIS?, Why do Westerners join ISIS?, ISIS recruits, Is ISIS Muslim?, Islam, Islamic State in Syria, Islamic State in the Levant, Globalized Islam, Global Salafism, Alireza Doostdar, Sightings, Understanding ISIS, ISIS Facts, ISIL facts, Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya, Neofundamentalism, Salafism, Salafi, Jihadi, Jihadi-Salafi
3 Comments

Why "world religion Bible studies" are awful

September 30, 2014

The U.S. is suffering from a case of multi-generational and multi-cultural  religious illiteracy —what Stephen Prothero calls, “religious amnesia.” The United States, in spite of its established secularism, is a thoroughly pluralistic nation with robust expressions of myriad world religions everywhere from the wheat fields of Iowa to the buckled asphalt of Los Angeles. Yet, we are simultaneously “a nation of religious illiterates” who flunk the most basic of quizzes on religion — even our own. It seems, “[m]ost Americans remain far more committed to respecting other religions than learning about them.” 

To the rescue come "world religion Bible studies" that attempt to help Christians navigate their world's stunning religious pluralism.  The problem is, most "world religion Bible studies" are terrible. 

While most of the leaders of these studies start with the intention to help their parishioners learn more about the world's religions, the way they go about it usually leads to nominally increased religious literacy. Even worse, these studies often exacerbate pre-existing prejudices or presuppositions about studied worldviews. 

Granted, not all world religion studies are horrible, but many I've been to, or heard of (and, admittedly, some of the ones I've taught), were dreadful. While I confess that I'm a culprit of creating crappy curriculums for a "world religion Bible study" or two, I humbly suggest that I have learned the error of my ways (mostly) and want to propose some strategies to remedy the oversights of well-meaning pastors and educators.

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

So, below are THREE REASONS WHY WORLD RELIGION BIBLE STUDIES SUCK and a few accompanying action points to make them better:   

1) Unschooled teachers 

The number one issue with the vast majority of these studies is those who are teaching don't know much about the world's religions in the first place. Furthermore, they are not in the least bit trained in how to properly engage in religious studies, which is a topic altogether distinct from the task of theology.

While teaching can be a wonderful way to learn, we should not feign being an expert when we really have not spent the time to gain expertise in one religion other than ours, let alone multiple world religions. And do not, for a moment, think that because you read one book, watched a movie, or visited a temple that this makes you an expert on Buddhism, Islam, Scientology, etc.

This is the cover of a book I wrote on "twenty major world religions" in New Zealand. It isn't the best, but what was great about it was that I submitted every chapter to a practitioner of that respective belief system. They corrected much of what I got wrong and provided deep insight into how to (re)present religion. 

Admittedly, several pastors confessed to me that they do not know much about the world's religions, but decide to teach on them anyways because, "my parishioners are asking me to." Granted, you, as a pastor or teacher, are in a tough place when people ask you to lead a study in an area you feel you know little about. I feel for you. But then there are other pastors who took one class on world religions, watched one documentary, or read one book and decide, "My people need to know this!" and like a crusader gallivanting off to slay the pagan hordes they announce a study to equip their congregants for the spiritual battle at hand. #Facepalm. Maybe you are the former, maybe you're the latter. Either way, you aren't an expert — I implore you to stop acting like one. 

Nonetheless, I feel for you. The problem is that we pastors and teachers are expected to be weekly experts on a wide variety of topics. Every Sunday a pastor is meant to churn out a sermon wherein he/she expounds on a relevant topic from a deep knowledge of the biblical text. People listen to the pastor as if he/she is an authority on the given topic (marriage, parenting, politics, etc.). While most pastors (certainly not all) are adept at interpreting Scripture, they are not mavens in every field. It's unfair to expect them to be an expert on everything — especially religions they were not trained in. Too often we pressure them to act as if they are. Likewise, teachers and educators are expected to cover a broad range of topics week-in and week-out, even if their knowledge on some of these topics is exhausted within the confines of the text they use to teach. This problem becomes paramount in teaching on world religions.

With untrained teachers and unqualified pastors diving head first into a study where they are presumed to be specialists, but are effectively faking even basic facility, what most world religion Bible studies become are cesspools of collective religious ignorance not classrooms prepped for increased religious literacy. 

Sometimes, in an effort to sidestep an educator's insufficiency for the task, an ex-member testimony is favored. Oh Lord have mercy, this is even worse. Certainly, ex-members have a voice to bring to the table and their perspective is a valuable one to appreciate in our study of religion. But it is only one voice and an extremely biased one at that. Ex-members are ex-members for a reason. While they may not "have an axe to grind" they will most definitely present a prejudiced perspective on a religion they now eschew. 

Imagine this -- an atheist meet-up group wants to learn more about Christianity. To do so, they bring in a former evangelical who no longer believes in God to talk about their former faith. Would you, as a Christian, say that the atheists in that group necessarily got a fair picture of Christianity? Would you want them to perhaps balance out their learning with some supplementary teaching or a current member's testimony? If not, you should. Relying on ex-member testimonies or teaching is a sure way to get a skewed impression of a world religion.

So, how do we fix this? Three ways:  

The fix: Get an education. Take a class, keep reading, enroll in a master's program. Become the expert you are pretending to be. Even a few classes on one religion will equip you to better teach that topic. However, do not think that taking one intro class on world religions or reading one book is enough. Dive deep into one religion before you endeavor to teach it. Enjoy that process? Keep going deeper or expand your knowledge to include other religions. Repeat as necessary.

The fix: Study in the presence, or even under, the "religious other." While I do not like the fertile terrain for prejudice that "othering" a people group creates, the reality is that most Christians feel that Muslims and Mormons, Jews, Jains, and Jedis are "the religious other." They feel uncomfortable talking about these other faiths in the presence of "the other" (cue creepy sci-fi music here). So, they round up the wagons, close the parish hall doors, and "study" them from the safety of their own sanctuaries. As an educator, your task is to bust those doors down and make the learning environment an uncomfortable one. Bring in a Muslim to team-teach on Islam, invite an atheist to present their non-religious ways, visit a local mosque, temple, or place of worship to engage in experiential education, make your study public, or at the very least ask a Buddhist to sit in on your teaching to call you out or offer further food for thought. Yeah, it will be awkward, unsettling, and a bit "weird," but that's a good thing. In that environment learning is probably going to take place on all sides. 

The fix: Bring in the experts. f all else fails, ask the experts. Bring in a local professor or your denomination's resident religious scholar, anthropologist, or sociologist. As mentioned before, bring in a Buddhist monk to share their practice, an imam to elucidate their beliefs, etc. Shameless plug: invite me to come and speak. While I can't speak to EVERY religion with expertise, I can at least point you in the right direction or start you off with the right tools/perspective. 

2) The category of "world religions" is problematic anyways

Even if a pastor/teacher is schooled in the ways of the world's religions, what is a "world religion?" Most studies pick out a few heavy hitters among the sundry spiritualities that are held and practiced around the globe. There are some usual suspects that pop up in almost every world religion study. Here's an example from the table of contents of a self-titled "world religion Bible study" curriculum: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Confucianism, Bahai Faith, Spirit Religions, Atheism, New Age Movement, and others. This is a generous list. Another "world religion" study I saw recently (at a Lutheran church) sought to teach the following: Catholicism, Islam, Anglicanism, Pentecostalism, Buddhism.... Yikes. 

This was a fun study that we did at a local brewery in Houston, Texas. While I taught this one solo, I had people who were Christian, agnostic, atheist, "spiritual, but not religious," Confucian, and Buddhist come to the study. They called me out when I needed it. And then we had a beer together, so it was all cool. 

The issue here is that these lists, and most other scopes and sequences of world religions studies make three mistakes: 1) ignore religions and spiritualities on the periphery (e.g. Sikhism, Yoruba, Juche, etc.); 2) lump together multiple world views and practiced spiritualities into general categories that obfuscate more than they educate ("Spirit religions" covers a wide, diverse, range of religions/spiritualities ranging from indigenous religion to hybrid spiritualities, New Age and "others" is necessarily ambiguous, and "Islam" and "Hinduism" obscure realities that exist in the margins); 3) make divisions where they need not do so (is a "world religions" class the proper place to present the differences between Catholics and Lutherans?). 

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

These categories, meant to help simplify the study or book (however well-meaning they are) betray a dangerous unsophistication when it comes to apperceiving and appreciating the wild diversity of religious beliefs and spiritual practice around the world. 

The fix: Teach the tools. For years, the archetypal format of religious studies tended to place different religious traditions, typically those deemed to be “the world’s ‘great’ religions,” in their respective silos and investigate them each according to some prescribed rubric based on the author’s own definition of religion. This pedagogical approach tended to dissociate individual traditions from the study of religion as a whole and, even, from the students themselves. Since, as authors George D. Chryssides and Ron Geaves noted, students “rarely come to study religion because they wish to be neutral social scientists or simply to describe religious belief and practice more accurately,” this method bequeaths a superficial knowledge of religion at best and exacerbated stereotypes of the spiritual at its worst. Hence, I suggest an initial approach that involves considering what it means, and looks like, to study religion from a disciplined, self-reflective, point of view rather than a theological one. In lieu of teaching the religions themselves, teach how to study religion in the first place. Teach how to ask questions, be a participant-observer, etc. The rules that apply to training apply here too. If you don't feel comfortable as a religious student, bring someone in who is. 

3) Straw man studies

Now, if untrained leaders and unrefined categories are bad, this problem is the Satan-of-world-religion-studies incarnate. 

I get what the leader of these studies is trying to do: help their flock better understand other religions so that they can witness to their neighbor, coworker, family member, or friend. Typically, the end game of these studies is to help the Christian better evangelize someone of another faith. 

Putting the issues of hegemony, colonialism, and arrogance involved in discussions of Christian mission and evangelism aside for a moment, such an approach in a world religion Bible study is bad for the simple reason that in the rush to get to "what's wrong with this religion" that we usually end up skipping over "what this religion is" in the first place. 

We either misapprehend, or misrepresent, world religions by presenting a "straw man" form of the faith  (a hollow, or sham, version of the worldview that is easily defeated in an artificial argument without "the other" present) or do so by seeking first to pinpoint error rather than attempting first to understand. 

This shot is from an event called, "Interview with an atheist," in which I invited two local, prominent, non-believers to share their story in front of a Christian audience. We then had a Q&A session that was uncomfortable, challenging, and wonderful in every way. It was not a debate. It was not a "bash the atheist/Christian" fest. It was a charitable dialogue, and everyone walked away changed. 

Sabine MacCormack in her book Religion in the Andes: Vision and Imagination in Colonial Peru shared how missionaries in colonial Peru set out to comprehend Incan religion as it was practiced in both in the centers of power (i.e. Cusco) and in the rural Andes. In their accounts, they made two fatal mistakes: 1) by setting out with the primary purpose of extirpating (destroying) these beliefs and practices and 2) interpreting these religions through their own spiritual lenses. These approaches meant that the missionaries completely misinterpreted the religion as it was presented to them. They misconstrued myths, received a false impression about beliefs, and misread rituals.  All the while, the Andean beliefs and practices survived and even thrived, whether under the guise of Catholicism or out in the open, and often with greater emphasis than before. Setting out to eradicate the religion of the Andes, the missionaries misunderstood it completely. Too often, world religion Bible studies do the same. 

The fix: Study in the presence, or even with, the "religious other." Again, there is nothing better for our mutual learning and understanding than having a Muslim present when you teach on Islam. Give permission for them to correct you where they think you are wrong. Maybe you're not and they just don't like the way you put it. But, maybe you are. Have the guts to have a practitioner of the faith you are studying call you out. Assume insiders are the experts, you would expect the same from someone studying Christianity. Your study will be MUCH BETTER because of it. 

The fix: Seek understanding and relationship. The primary goal of your study should be understanding and bridge building, not apologetics or polemic. Before you call the heresy police, hear me out. While we often see our friendships with people of other faith as a means to an end, I am proposing that we see the relationships as ends unto themselves. Part of God's grand plan is a restoring of what was lost in our fall from grace. Part of Christ's redemptive work is to bring together that which was torn asunder. Understanding other religions, and building relationships with "the religious other," is part and parcel to the resurrective, restorative, and recreative kingdom of Jesus -- to bring unity and fellowship where there was disharmony and division. This does not mean forsaking witness, but it does mean not orsaking friendship for the sake of witness. Witness to the worldview, sure. Share your faith, certainly. But the friendship must endure, the understanding must be the primary goal, and the first step in evangelizing needs to be shutting our mouths, and opening our ears, to listen and learn.

*Was this post helpful? Hurtful? Have a suggestion? Want to accuse me of heresy or worse? This blog is meant to be a provocation toward deeper understanding. It's a beginning. There will certainly be revisions in my own thought -- additions, subtractions, and perhaps a crumpling of the entire project and a total re-write before we can, together, build a “strong, benevolent Christianity” (a la Brian McLaren) that can successfully engage other religions, spiritualities, and worldviews in a context defined by religious pluralism. So, please share your thoughts with me below or via e-mail. 

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

 

In Church Ministry, Missiology, Religion, Religious Literacy, Religious Studies Tags World religions, Bible study, Religious literacy, Stephen Prothero, Brian McLaren, Interview with an atheist, Ken Chitwood, Religious studies
Comment

"Why do Westerners join ISIS?" Featured at Sojourners

September 29, 2014

Over the weekend, my post "The lonely jihadi: Why do Westerners join ISIS?" was featured on the Sojourner's 'God's Politics' blog.

Sojourner's magazine is a progressive publication of the social justice organization Sojourners, founded by current editor Jim Wallis who is active in bringing faith to light on issues of racial and social justice, life and peace, and environmental stewardship. 

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood.

It was an honor to write for their online portal and I amended my original post to include a section on how Christian congregations and individuals can "combat" ISIS. While there is much to be said about the essentializing, and perhaps racially tinged, "multi-cultural" viewpoint that I espouse (casting "Muslims" as a community bloc or single identity given so much internal diversity) I still believe that a program of positive, multifaceted, integration on the public and private levels is the way forward in dealing with extremism and isolated individuals who join radical, violent, causes. This integration is not assimilation as such, but a bridge building and re-construction of what it means to be American (or European) in light of Muslim belief and practice. It is a two-way street, but one which non-Muslims (who too often cast Muslims in a solely negative light) bear the prime responsibility to cross. This is not because Muslims are incapable of making inroads toward integration, but the onus is on those of us who tend to push them to the margins in the first place. 

Anyways, check out the blog and react to my paragraph about pro-active Christian initiatives to integrate the isolated Muslim who tends to join groups like ISIS: 

Christians can be engaged at both the personal and congregational level. It begins with paying attention and recognizing the Muslim communities and individual Muslim families in your neighborhood and community; then, the impetus to find, and form, appropriate and respectful relationships. Once a friendship is established, take the time to listen, learn, and value their Islamic faith and practice. This friendship is best established, and nourished, through dining together, dialogue events, and interfaith community projects. These friendly encounters will not only build new bridges between Muslims and Christians, but also integrate isolated Muslims into the fold of their new communities making a home for them beyond the boundaries of religion and ethnicity.

These types of efforts, more than bombs and bombastic rhetoric, are how we can combat the lonely jihadi and make a significant contribution to peace in the Middle East, and indeed, across the globe.

In Church Ministry, Religion and Culture, Religion News Tags Sojourners, Jim Wallis, ISIS, Iraq, Syria, ISIL, Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya, Christian left, God's Politics, Why do Westerners join ISIS?, Why do people join ISIS?, Integration, Multiculturalism, neo-Orientalism, Orientalism, Muslims, integration
Comment

Photo: Reuters

The lonely jihadi: why do Westerners join ISIS?

September 25, 2014

Whether or not ISIS/ISIL is "Islamic," or a "state," it is definitely terrifying. As it terrorizes the Levant -- killing Muslims, Christians, Jews, Yazidis, & other religious/cultural minorities in Syria and Iraq -- and takes the lives of Western journalists, it strikes fear in the hearts of many. 

Swirling around the alarming analysis are the rumors and realities of individuals from Europe and the U.S. joining the ranks of ISIS/ISIL and fighting for their "cause." 

The intelligence organization Soufan Group recently released a report stating that fighters from at least 81 countries have traveled to Syria since its three-year conflict began. Hundreds of recruits come from nations like France, Germany, the UK, and the U.S. 

Of all the fearful intimations of this conflict, this feature seems to be the most frightening to many in the West. Could it be that my neighbor is a secret jihadi? Are redheads (a "pure" European stock) more prone to terrorism? Are mosques their hideouts? Regardless of the judiciousness of these questions, underlying them all is the question "why?" Why would someone leave the West to fight for ISIS in Syria and Iraq?  

According to the Soufan report, those that leave for the Middle East to fight are typically 18-29 year-old men (some as young as 15) and some Western women who join with their spouses, or come alone to become "jihadi brides." These men and women are Islamic, often second or third generation immigrants, though very few have prior connections with Syria. 

Why do they join? Is it religious devotion? Psychological imbalance? Tendency toward radical movements and anarchy? All of these motivations may play a part, but my argument is that these men and women who leave their Western homes for the dunes of terror are lonely. 

These Western jihadis are isolated -- that is why they join ISIS. 

In his book Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah Olivier Roy says that in the passage to the West, Islam as a religion (and its practitioners) undergo a deterritorializing, deculturalizing, and destabilizing process that, both of us argue, leaves individuals in search for a new ummah (global Islamic community, on the macro level) and a new community (on the micro level). 

As Islam is less and less associated with a specific nation, tribe, or territory (deterritorialization) the lines between Islam and the West become blurred. This leads to Islamization and a renewed and revived effort to stake a clear claim for Islam in the modern world. This Islamic revival can be either progressive or conservative, but it leaves the individual Muslim with a choice. This choice is problematized by the fact that, often, to be "Muslim" is necessary for the sake of identification in the West. 

In the West, Islam undergoes a deculturalization process, which leaves the term "Muslim" as the sole identifier (as opposed to Egyptian, Somali, Indonesian, Bosnian, Argentinian, etc.) Muslims lose their sense of culture in the West, no longer able to identify according to their ethnic heritage or national identity. In this environment, where religion defines identity, two things happen: 1) Muslims feel they must ratify their credentials -- prove they are really, and truly, "Muslim" to people within, and on the outside, of their community or 2) having broken with the culture of their past, second and third generation Muslim migrants who are part of, but do not feel integrated into, Western society choose to reconstruct their identity along strict Islamic lines. 

This whole process is quite destabilizing as it continues to isolate the individual from their former identity markers -- family, culture, nation. Everything that used to define them -- their culture, their dress, their economic standing, their political affiliation -- breaks down in the West and they are left with Islam alone to rebuild themselves. In this process is offered, what Roy calls, "the realization of the self." (37) Islam becomes the way that the marginalized and lonely Muslim in the West can reconstruct their identity. 

Of course, this self cannot be reconstructed alone. There needs to be a community within which it can be rebuilt and resurrected. Enter ISIS.

"Neofundamentalist" (Roy prefers this term over 'Salafi') jihadi groups offer answers to what ails secluded Muslims in the West. Their community is built upon the free association of individuals and voluntary devotion to the community's cause. It is a "reconstructed ummah," one in which the individual plays an oversized role. 

However, the ummah is never really reconstructed. Terror groups rarely have an end goal in mind. They do not wish to establish an "Islamic state," no matter what they call themselves. They are comfortable with the deterritorialized condition and the destabilized nature of the world and continually leave it up to individuals to construct the community and define its norms. In the process, fanaticism and radicalism germinate as insecurity about the borders of the community intensify. The lonely jihadi who left the West for "true Muslim community," finds that the lines are blurred even within ISIS. The loneliness and deep inner questions continue. 

In the midst of this "imagined ummah" undertaking, groups like ISIS inculcate a sixth pillar of 'individual jihad' to give purpose to the life of the wayward Muslim. "This overemphasis on personal jihad complements the lonely situation of the militants, who do not follow their natural community, but join an imagined one." (42) Fighting and, to a greater degree, giving one's life to the cause, becomes the "ultimate proof" not only of one's religious devotion, but also of one's "reform of the self." (289) All the while, in search of a new community, the jihadi remains alone, isolated, and solitary -- especially in suicide attacks. 

This is why bombing, however "strategic," will not stem the tide against terror organizations such as ISIS. Unfortunately, where integration or assimilation into Western societies is eschewed, the neofundamentalist path towards isolation, both externally and internally imposed, begins. Not all marginalized Muslims in the West join jihadi groups. Some of them simply choose to live in "Islamized territories" (Islamic ghettos, per se) shut off from Western influence even as they live in the West. However, for those that do not find that such closed communities fit the bill, radical Islamic terror groups call out ever stronger. 

Thus, programs for integration and assimilation -- at the national, local, and personal levels -- are the only way to "fight" ISIS and restrict the flow of Westerners joining their ranks. Assimilation should not mean that Muslims must give up the authentic beliefs and practices of their faith. Integration does not lead to Islamization or the imposition of shariah law. It is, instead, a friendly policy towards Muslims in the West that leads all of us, Muslim and Christian/Jew/agnostic/etc. deeper into a real community where identity is not solely defined by religion, but also historic cultural, and new national, characteristics. 

This is how we can combat the lonely jihadi. 

In PhD Work, Religion and Culture Tags Islam, Jihadi, ISIS, ISIL, Iraq, Syria, Olivier Roy, Globalized Islam, New ummah, lonely, isolated, marginalized, friendly, Muslims, Shariah
2 Comments

Three things the Church can do to work with Millennials

September 23, 2014

A couple weeks ago I wrote a piece for Lutheran Church Extension Fund's (LCEF) Leader-to-leader blog called, "Confessions of a Millennial church curmudgeon." It got picked up by OnFaith, formerly a Washington Post publication and now a branch of FaithStreet. 

I'm honored to have it re-worked and re-posted there. Check it out HERE. 

In Religion and Culture, Church Ministry Tags Millennial, craft beer, church, ministry to millennials, curmudgeon, cortado, Washington Post, OnFaith, FaithStreet, LCEF, Ken Chitwood
Comment

#QuranChallenge aims to go viral

September 22, 2014

As I continue my research into global Islam, and the various manifestations of its transnational and local dimensions, I also get the chance to cover some of the phenomena I encounter as a freelance religion newswriter. Graciously, the Religion News Service accepted my story on the #QuranChallenge - an increasingly popular social media Quran recitation challenge being passed around YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. 

Below is an excerpt from the article, read the rest at ReligionNews.com

*For more religion & culture news & commentary, follow @kchitwood

(RNS) Move over Ice Bucket Challenge. Muslims have a new take on the viral social media phenomenon: the Quran Challenge.

The new campaign seeks to raise awareness and funds for Muslim "da’wah" -- a call to propagate the faith -- by reciting verses from the Quran on various online platforms.

Issam Bayan, a 26-year-old student and professional Islamic singer, came up with the idea as a way to awaken Muslim piety, just as the Ice Bucket Challenge raised awareness and well over $30 million for ALS, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, a degenerative condition also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease.

While the #QuranChallenge has no specific cause, Bayan, who lives in Germany, said he wanted to make it available to all Muslims regardless of their financial ability to make a contribution. In an email interview, he said the benefits for this challenge are the rewards that a Muslim receives for reciting the Quran.

*Read more HERE

Tags Quran Challenge, Issam Bayan, Ken Chitwood, University of Florida, Terje Ostebo, Islam, Quran, Da'wah, Recitation, Ice Bucket Challenge
Comment

Why our preaching should be more like a sitcom

September 18, 2014

“That’s like me blaming owls for how bad I suck at analogies.” – Britta, from Community (TV series)

Community is a TV show following a group of students and professors at a community college in the fictional town of Greendale, Colorado. The show is a treasure trove of pop-culture references, playing off tropes in film and television, showcasing a willingness to make fun of itself and pile jokes upon jokes in a single episode for one crescendo of a punch line (called “meta-humor”).

It’s a critically acclaimed show and its creator Dan Harmon combines density and depth with relevant humor to craft a compelling story. In Community, he is able to impressively construct compact narratives for multiple characters in a single 22-minute episode and make everyone laugh as he weaves his tale. He is a genius storyteller.

This is exactly what our preaching style should be like.

*Read the entire piece at FiveTwo.com

In Church Ministry Tags Preaching, Harmon, Exegesis, FiveTwo, Community, TV show, Story arc
Comment

Confession of a Millennial Church Curmudgeon

September 17, 2014

I confess, I’m a Millennial church curmudgeon.

Of course, the stereotypical image of a “church curmudgeon” is the bad tempered elderly man, arms crossed, complaining about how the music is too loud and the pews too soft.

And then there’s me. Donning a bow tie and skinny jeans, with dark-rimmed glasses and a pair of loafers, I strut into your church with one mission — to judge you and your ministry. I’ll nit pick your artwork, or lack thereof. I’ll chastise you for not having online giving and pontificate to my friends over brunch how your church is from the Stone Age because your website isn’t up-to-date. And, fair warning, if your slides are just one second off…sorry, but that’s tantamount to undoing the work of the cross.

*Read more at LCEF's Leader-to-Leader Blog

In Church Ministry Tags LCEF, Millennial, Church, Leadership, Mentorship, Mentoring, Mentoring Millennials, Elders
Comment

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Of Presbyterians and Whiskey: the role of religion in Scottish independence

September 17, 2014

In the coverage of the Scottish independence referendum news agencies have taken just about every imaginable angle, from whiskey to sport to pop culture icons such as James Bond and Harry Potter. 

Yet, in the midst of all the economic, cultural, and political discussions, precious view pundits have addressed the question of religion.

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

On Thursday September 18, 2014 the Scottish people will vote on the question, "Should Scotland be an independent country? -- voters can answer 'Yes' or 'No.' Amidst the political wrangling and fits of nationalism, what is the role of religion in the vote for Scottish independence? Is there one to speak of? 

After all, religion has featured prominently in shaping, and dividing, the United Kingdom throughout the years. From the Druid queen Boudica who led a Celtic rebellion against the Roman Empire to the War of the Three Kingdoms and the Protestant-Catholic bloodshed in Northern Ireland, religion has always produced great conflict in the British Isles. 

Specifically in Scotland, religion has played a significant role in fashioning "the greatest country on Earth." Although precious little is known about religious practices before the arrival of Christianity, the Picts (traditional Scottish tribes) most likely observed a form of "Celtic polytheism" with Druid elements. Christianity seeped into the country even before the momentous events at Hadrian's Wall in 367 C.E., but its official arrival in Scotland took place thirty years later when St. Ninian founded the first Christian Church in Scotland. Despite massive efforts to convert the native Scots, there were still some in need of conversion when St. Columba arrived shortly after 563. It seems likely that Celtic Christianity was firmly planted across Scotland by the end of the 600s.

Scottish Christianity had an independent flare throughout the Early Middle Ages. Celtic Christianity in Scotland was distinct from Roman common Catholicism, with the monastic movement playing an outsized role and abbots being more authoritative than Archbishops in the land. The wee Scottish church also firmly entrenched its independence from England, even constructing a clear division between its diocesan bureaucracy and that of England. However, by the Later Middle Ages, England was firmly in control of the church in Scotland and would continue to exert its influence over Scots through ecclesiastical channels.

Religion did not play a key role in the famous "Braveheart Battles" of the 13th and 14th centuries led by William Wallace. However, Wallace's Catholic faith is often overlooked. Wallace received a Catholic education and according to Vatican sources, his career was originally church oriented being schooled by Augustinians and Benedictine monks. A series of violent events led him away from the Benedictine cloister and into the bloody battlefield. His faith continued to shape him however, as he recited the Psalter as he disemboweled and quartered for his sedition.

During the 16th-century, the Scottish Reformation took a decidedly Calvinist turn thanks to the influence of James VI's preference for Calvinism. Presbyterianism was birthed through the reformational bloodshed and battles of the Scots (see the Bishops' Wars and the Scottish Civil War of 1644-1645) and Scottish Presbyterianism remains the most potent religious force in Scotland today with "the Kirk" -- the Church of Scotland -- claiming a third of the Scottish population's allegiance.  

However, Scots are by and large very secular these days. The largest "religious" category, according to the 2011 census data, is "no religion" with 36.7% of the population and 200,000 more adherents than The Church of Scotland. Still, when Catholics (16%) and Other Christians (5.5%) are combined with Presbyterians, Christianity is still the "majority religion" (54%) even if it is largely cultural devotion rather than religious fidelity. Other religions are on the rise in the country, with sizable minority populations of Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, and Sikhs on the rise over the last decade due to immigration and second/third generation faithfulness. Despite its roots in the country, Paganism (and its antecedent, Neo-Paganism) is relatively hard to find in Scotland, with Shetland being the only destination where it is common.

With such a sundry religious landscape, what role could religion play in the Scottish independence referendum? How could religion, in any significant way, unite Scots behind self-government? 

Will Scots declare their independence on Thursday? Will religion or whiskey play a larger role in their decision? 

Some backers of the Better Together campaign (the supporters of the "no" vote on the referendum) spread rumors on the blogosphere that an independent Scotland would see a decidedly Protestant leaning nation that might very well turn on its Catholic constituents. There were even talks of renewed persecution of Catholics and perhaps bloodshed on the streets akin to that which was seen in Northern Ireland in the 1990s. 

However, the data seem to say that Catholics are not that worried about Scottish independence and Church of Scotland faithful are not even that keen on the entire project. In a 2012 poll, 30% of Catholics supported independence with just 16% "worried" about the prospect of a separate Scotland. Compare this to the 26% of the "nones" who support independence and the 17% of Church of Scotland members and it seems that Catholics are by and large the biggest supporters of Scottish sovereignty.  

Even so, to guard against any potential persecution or state church scenario in an independent Scotland, churches and faith groups held an interfaith conference in Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire in July calling for the role of religion to be recognized in any written constitution for Scotland. The Scottish government has promised that it does not plan to change the legal status of any religion -- Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, or Jewish -- if the referendum were to pass.

Nonetheless, the reality is that religion plays a decidedly minor role in the debate concerning Scottish autonomy, even if it has shaped the democratic ideals and autonomous spirit of the nation's subconscious. Whereas religion played an outsized role in the historical battles between Scotland and England, it has faded into the background in an overtly secular Scotland and generally areligious United Kingdom.

Markedly more important than faith and religious ritual are discussions of oil reserves, currency, and yes -- Scotch whiskey. 

In Religion and Culture, Religion News Tags Scotland, Scottish independence, William Wallace, Scottish Presbyterianism, Celtic Polytheism, Druids, Catholicism in Scotland, Protestantism in Scotland, Secular Scotland, Scotch whiskey
Comment

Photo: Reuters

The danger of crafting Muslim identities for our own purposes

September 16, 2014

*For more on religion & culture follow @kchitwood

The situation with ISIS/ISIL (Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya) continues to heat up. ISIS continues to post videos of atrocious beheadings of their Western prisoners (two U.S. journalists and a British aid-worker). These digital demonstrations have provoked the Western military powers into intense discussions of reprisals and concrete conversations about constructing a coalition.

*Read "Five Facts You Need to Know about Iraq, its Religious Minorities, and ISIS."

Amidst the flurry of emotion and geo-political crusading an interesting, misleading, trend has re-surfaced: the crafting of Muslim identity by non-Muslims for the latter's own purposes.

President Barack Obama's comments to this effect did not go unnoticed. He said on September 10, just a day before the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks:

“...let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not “Islamic.” No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim. And ISIL is certainly not a state.”

POTUS's comments echo those of George W. Bush who famously quipped in the aftermath of 9/11, that Islam "is a peaceful religion" (Nov 13, 2002) and that:

“Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim. We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.”
— October 11, 2002

Obama used this language before moving on to say, "Our objective is clear: we will degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counter-terrorism strategy."

British Prime Minister David Cameron joined in with the ISIS ≠ Islam prose. In the wake of the execution of British aid-worker David Haines, Cameron remarked that ISIS "are not Muslims, they are monsters." He branded the ISIS killings and subsequent videos as acts "of pure evil" and vowed that the UK, "will do everything in our power to hunt down these murderers and ensure they face justice." 

Cameron, and Obama, made comments about what Islam is, and what it is not, that allowed them to justify their actions. Realizing that the "clash of civilizations" rhetoric (the "West" versus "Islam") is not popular sentiment, nor is it conducive to building a coalition that would include Muslim-states and Muslim majority nations, the two Western leaders made sweeping statements about what Islam is, and is not, in order to vindicate their aggressive, military-based, retaliations. 

Response to Cameron and Obama's comments has been mixed. Many from progressive Muslim communities praised them for drawing a line between their peaceful faith and practice and the brutal extremism of ISIS. Many on the far-right of the political spectrum (and even some from among the ranks of the "New Atheists," including Sam Harris) in the U.S. lambasted POTUS for his "ignorance" concerning ISIS and Islam, saying that he "isn't qualified enough to say what is and what is not Muslim." 

Photo: Shibli Zaman, Loonwatch.com

At the same time, a Twitter handle by the name of "Ahimla Jihada" (@Ahimla2), which spouted seemingly supportive superlatives for ISIS from an "American-Muslim woman" was found to be a fake. Before the account was shutdown, the tweets of @Ahimla2, which declared her devotion to ISIS and love for terror (from within the United States no less!) produced strong responses calling for her death and the killing of many more Muslims in the U.S. Shibli Zaman at Loonwatch.com lamented:

“There are dubious forces from an increasingly belligerent political Right who are out to brainwash, by hook or crook, the American public into hating their fellow citizens of the Muslim faith and to justify a foreign policy in the ‘10/40 Window’ that has tarnished America’s reputation globally and needlessly puts our men and women in uniform in harm’s way.”

While Cameron/Obama/Bush may be lauded for trying to distinguish between ISIS and global Islam and this Twitter scandal may be mourned as an attempt to justify Islamophobia in the U.S., they are both examples of the same error: Western politicians or popular pundits cannot be the ones to say what Islam is and is not. 

*Read "Does ISIS = Islam?"

At issue here is the question -- who has the right to define what Islam is and is not? 

Language has power to shape opinions and to galvanize people to action. These leaders and culture shapers understand this. That is why they use essentializing terminology to declare what Islam is and is not. By becoming arbiters of Islamic identity, Western leaders seek to make essentialist claims in order to provide powerful, and useful, rallying-points for their own agendas. In these cases, attacking and destroying ISIS on the one hand, turning on Muslims in the U.S. on the other. 

While artlessly defining Islam may prove useful for political purposes, it is not conducive to helping non-Muslims understand what Islam is. Concepts such as 'Islam' are not static. There is no fixed form of Islam that can be found or defined, especially by non-Muslims. Instead, Islam is a diverse stream of various forces, persistently in process, forever in flux, consistently contingent on changing cultural, political, ethnic, religious, and economic realities. Really, the language of Obama, Cameron, @Ahimla2 and others who want to say neatly that ISIS is Islamic, or it is not Islamic, is hegemony at work again -- colonial powers attempting to define the "other" in order to exert their own influence or power in the Islamic world. 

My concern here is not political, it is not militaristic. Instead, it is one of religious literacy. Islam is one of the most multi-cultural, multi-generational, multifaceted, and misunderstood religions in the world, especially in the West. In order to understand Islam, we cannot apperceive it according to uncluttered constructs or uncomplicated categories. Instead, the messiness and miscellany of the Muslim world must be explored. This will often mean meeting with local Muslims, observing regional dynamics, and listening, and learning, their perspectives on global Islam. Especially in the West, we need to listen to Muslims speak about their own community, from all sides, before we begin crafting Muslim identities according to our own motivations -- be they benign or malevolent.  

If Western powers or Islamophobes want to say what Islam is or is not for their own political ends, so be it. What I don't want to see is the general population getting carried away with a vision of Islam that is founded more in Western hegemony than it is global Islamic reality. 

 

In Religion, Religion and Culture, Religion News, Religious Literacy, Religious Studies Tags ISIS, ISIL, Islamic State in Syria, Islamic State in the Levant, Al-Dawla Al-Islamiya, President Obama, 9/11, Is ISIS Muslim?, George W. Bush, David Cameron, David Haines, Ahimla Jihada, Loonwatch, Shibli Zaman, Ahimla2, Essentializing, Essentialism, hegemony, colonialism, Islam, Muslim
2 Comments

Does ISIS = Islam?

September 10, 2014

Does ISIS = Islam? Does Islam = ISIS? 

In the wake of rising violence and thuggish rhetoric, many are re-visiting the common accusation that terror groups and rogue states such as ISIS are Islam and that any discussion about the varieties of Islamic belief and ritual throughout the world is smokescreen. The assumptive claim is that if you prick Islam it always bleeds terror, hate, and violence. 

Dr. Terje Østebø, whose perspective on global Islam helped inspire this post, is involved in the launch of the University of Florida’s Center for Global Islamic Studies. After The Gainesville Sun published an article on the center’s launch, Østebø suffered vitriol via comments, phone calls, and e-mails. Although Østebø said, “There is an urgent need for a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the rich diversity and the complex dynamics of contemporary Islam," many of his critics found the need to point out to him — the scholar in Islam — that Islam is clearly typified by ISIS and that ISIS is at the core of this world religion.

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

Unfortunately, these verbal assaults are too often accompanied by physical attacks as well as just last week, a man chased a Muslim American woman into oncoming traffic in Brooklyn while threatening to behead her and her companion. Every time I post an article, like this one, I will undoubtedly receive comments like this from Cowboywill46:

“Once and for all, will someone with a grain of sense admit to the world that Islam is nothing more than a mind-control, anti-social cult bent on world domination. ”
— Cowboywill46

To be fair, Islam is a world religion with a unifying foundation. It may be the Qur’an, or the holy book’s common language — Arabic. The shahada, or profession of faith that “there is no god but God and Muhammad is his prophet,” is universal in form — all Muslims confess it, it is what it takes, and means, to be Muslim. Mecca, perhaps, as “the capital of Islam” serves as, in the words of Miriam Cooke and Bruce B. Lawrence, as “[t]he organizing principle of Islamic ritual and imagination.” As such, this Saudi Arabian city is “the defining node for a worldwide community of believers who are linked to the Prophet Muhammad and to Mecca and to one another through networks of faith and family, trade and travel.” Whether knit together by language, profession, text, orienting metropolis, or something else there is a unified, integrated, sense to global Islam and a shared cultural history. To be sure, there are not several, or even two, Islams, but one Islam. 

At the same time, Islam is, in the words of scholar Talal Asad, “a discursive tradition.” There is an ongoing debate, what Reza Aslan calls, “a civil war,” raging over what is orthodox Islam and where the boundary lines of Islam can be drawn. Islam, as a world system, is not static, but is always changing according to the various lines of its own “discursive traditions.” The tone of these various streams of thought about Islam are determined by local realities, Islamic networks, and by external global forces of economics, politics, religion, and culture. 

What do these localizations and various discursive traditions do to Islam’s shared cultural and textual heritage? Local Muslims, sharing in "global Islam," interpret Islam differently according to their socio-cultural, and historical, context. Sometimes accusing the other interpretation or lived religion as not “authentic” or “orthodox” Islam. This is why ISIS, along with killing Yazidis and Christians, also targets Muslims they deem kafir (unbelievers, or apostates) because of their extreme definition of takfir— those who claim Islam but are outside the strict boundaries of Islam that ISIS puts in place. 

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

Today is the 13th anniversary of the terror attacks of 9/11. Certainly, it is a somber remembrance and one with potent emotions and visceral reverberations in our cultural psyche. 9/11’s effect on our the U.S.’s interest in Islam has been a double-edged sword. While more solid, scholarly, work has been done on Islam in the U.S. than ever before, we have also been seeking to essentialize Islam in an effort to have manufacture a clearly defined enemy to combat. We want a clash of civilizations — Islam v. the West — but it’s not that simple. Seeking a “clash of civilizations” we usually end up with what Edward Said called, “a clash of ignorance” wherein “unedifying labels” such as “Islam” and the “West,” “mislead and confuse the mind, which is trying to make sense of a disorderly reality that won't be pigeonholed or strapped down as easily as all that.”

So, is Islam to be represented by ISIS? In one sense, yes. ISIS = Islam. However, ISIS ≠ global Islam. ISIS ≠ Islam everywhere. Not every Muslim living in the U.S., in sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, or Southeast Asia is a secret jihadi with ties to ISIS, Boko Haram, or al-Qaeda. Instead, ISIS is an expression of Islam in its locality (Syria, Iraq, the Levant) forged out of a combination of contextual concerns, socio-cultural realities, and translocal forces of politics, economics, and religion. As such, it is competing to be the authoritative voice of Islam and, in many ways, wants pundits and cultural commentators to say that ISIS = Islam. 

Yet, to say ISIS = Islam is too simplistic. There are too many other Muslim communities and expressions of glocal (localized forms of the one global faith) Islam throughout the world. Islam is a diverse global faith, which takes on a different form, with varying interpretations of the Qur’an and the tradition of Muhammad where the local Muslim community deals with dissimilar concerns about local realities and contrasting views on religious violence and Westernization. This is why it is unsophisticated to simply posit that ISIS = Islam with no further discussion or clarification. 

After all, many Muslims claim that ISIS Is un-Islamic. Muslims in South Africa who fought for equality of all races after mistreatment and misrepresentation for centuries under Afrikaaner nationalism and apartheid and Muslims in Houston who advocate anti-gang initiatives and are actively engaged in inner-city education programs would not want to be lumped in with ISIS. They are engaged in a struggle, they share the same Islamic faith, but they are not ISIS. As Jaweed Kaleem reported for the Huffington Post, there is widespread disappointment among worldwide Muslims in how ISIS is often equated with Islam in popular media.

Even so, without any right or proper understanding, many will continue to try and declare what Islam is and is not. They will pipe up and declare that “ISIS is Islam” or ignore progressive understandings of Islam by countering, “but doesn’t the Qur’an actually say _______?” What the Qur’an says, not to be crass or offensive to my Muslim friends, is irrelevant. What is more relevant in this discussion is what Muslims say the Qur’an says. What ISIS says about what Islam is or what the Qur’an says is going to be different than a Muslim community in Miami or a Muslim organization in Indonesia. Muslims’ interpretation of their shared holy text is defined by their local context, their historical moment, their transnational networks, socio-cultural realities, and interaction with global forces.

If we are to understand Islam — and ever since 9/11, 7/7, and other terrible terrorist attacks, it is evident that we must in some way endeavor to do so — our shared starting point cannot be solely those groups that engage in terrorism, persecution, and barbarous bombast. Instead, we must approach Islam as a global phenomenon, with a certain sense of interconnectedness and unity. At the same time, we must come to appreciate and pay attention to its various localities as they wrestle with the shared international socio-cultural forces of Westernization, globalization, and transnationalism. 

Does ISIS = Islam? 

Yes, but it’s too superficial of us to say “yes” unequivocally. It has to be a nuanced affirmation, one that appreciates that as much as ISIS is Islam, it is also equally not Islam. In the end, we must listen to Muslims, and their various discourses about orthodoxy, Muslim boundaries, and authenticity, before we can come to any strong conclusions or make any serious political or religious decisions about Islam as a whole based on the actions of the few who take part in the violent actions of ISIS and its counterparts.  

*For more on religion and culture, follow @kchitwood

 

 

In Religion and Culture, Religion, Religion News, Religious Literacy, Religious Studies, PhD Work Tags discursive tradition, Terje Ostebo, Reza Aslan, kafir, Bruce B. Lawrence, Miram Cooke, Global Islam, Talal Aslad, Edward Said, University of Florida, Islam, Clash of Ignorance, clash of civilizations, taqfir, takfiri, ISIS
4 Comments

Ten Novels Every U.S. Christian Should Read

September 4, 2014

People are into books right now. That's #Awesome. There is, in the wake of the #IceBucketChallenge, a "list your top ten most influential/favorite books" #bookchallenge floating around social media (e.g. Facebook) right now. There are blogs, like Justin Taylor's "Between Two Worlds" at The Gospel Coalition, that are running a series on "novels every Christian should consider reading." As a bibliophile, I'm all for it. O masses, read on!

“The more you read, the more things you will know. The more that you learn, the more places you’ll go.”
— Dr. Seuss

So, mixing Justin Taylor's "novels every Christian should consider reading" with the "top ten influential books" list I put forward my, "Top Ten List of Novels that every U.S. (and, to be honest, specifically white, middle class) Christian Should Read." 

Why this list? 

Our top ten lists and choices of novels often reinforce our own philosophies and voices. This isn't horrible per se, but when we only we read what we like or what confirms our biases we are never challenged to think beyond our current worldview. That can be dangerous. One of my favorite aspects of the top ten lists people are posting on Facebook is that many of the novels they list came from their high school or college reading lists. There's a reason for this, someone told you to read this book because they thought it might challenge you.  At its best, literature cracks us open, challenges us, and provokes us to discover and be confronted by strange new worlds or by deconstructing comfortable, familiar ones.

Therefore, This list is predominated by what some call "subaltern" voices, or "the little voices of history." These voices are post-colonial and come from often marginalized authors or, at the least, are written from their perspective. Basically, this list  presents pieces of fiction that should shake up and disturb comfortable, middle-class, suburban, caucasian, Christians...not to mention many others. We need this if we wish to continue to interact with the new power centers of Christianity in the "the Global South" (Africa, Asia, and Latin America). We have to face that we are not the hegemonic power we once were and deconstruct our neocolonial thought patterns, ministry actions, academic exercises, methodologies, and mission emphases -- no matter how well intentioned. These novels will help us to see from this perspective, albeit limitedly. They are meant to humble us. 

TEN NOVELS EVERY U.S. CHRISTIAN SHOULD READ:

1. Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison -- This is the story of a young, naïve African-American man in the U.S. South who explores his own black identity and racism through experiences in college, with the Communist Party, through riots, and under the streets of Harlem. There, in darkness and solitude he finally begins to understand himself -- his invisibility, and his identity.  Why read it? Invisible Man challenges us to consider marginal, invisible, voices and confronts us to consider stereotypes, racism, and subjugating and radicalizing social forces in the U.S. No surprise, I read it in a high school literature class. Thanks Mrs. Kelly. 

2. The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck -- Told in traditional Chinese narrative style and written by the daughter of missionaries, this story amplifies traditional family life in a Chinese village before World War I. It follows the fortunes and pitfalls of a rural farmer and the slave of an opium-soaked merchant household who eventually come to own all they worked hard for. Why read it? This book has it all, exploring women's rights, family dynamics, class conflict, spiritual struggle, moral dilemmas, simplicity versus complexity and the pressures of the modern world. 

3. The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver -- The Price family, missionaries from Georgia, head to the jungle of Africa to convert the masses. Only, it isn't that easy. Confronted with culture shock, mosquitos, snakes, political upheavals, malaria, and their own metaphysical conundrums and shocking family dynamics the experience breaks them apart -- physically, mentally, and spiritually. Why read it? If I taught a course on world missions, this book would be required. Themes of forgiveness, cultural hegemony, culture shock, colonialism, racism, and more are all packed into this little bundle of heart-wrenching reading. You won't like this book, but you will most certainly love it.  

4. That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis -- A dystopian novel that wraps up Lewis' "Space Trilogy," That Hideous Strength features the battle between a sinister pseudo-scientific institute, the N.I.C.E., that plans to take over the world and is backed by demonic forces. Why read it? Ok, so this isn't a subaltern novel and it features Roman, Christian, and British philosophy and tropes, BUT it's still worth a read as it challenges our 21st-century's emphasis on scientific salvation, the divorcing of body and soul, and our tendency to permit Normal Nihilism in everyday life. 

5. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad -- Heart of Darkness follows one man's hellish journey into the interior of Africa where he encounters corruption, brutality, hate, violence, and colonial hegemony at its most capitalistic and manipulative worst. Why read it? While this book should be read hand-in-hand with a transcript of Chinua Achebe's "An Image of Africa," (or, for that matter, his tomic novel Things Fall Apart) the story still stands alone as a Gordian expedition into what constitutes the forced binary between 'barbarian' and 'civilized,' attitudes on colonialism, and imperial racism. Plus, the character of Katz is super mysterious. 

6. We Need New Names by NoViolet Bulawayo -- Oh sweet cream, this book is so good. It is a coming-of-age story of Darling, a Zimbabwean girl, who navigates her fragile and shifting world first as a ten year old in her home country and later as a teenager in the Midwest of the U.S. Why read it? Exploring themes of family, immigration, and cultural memory this book captures,  "the uneasiness that accompanies a newcomer’s arrival in America, [and] illuminate[s] how the reinvention of the self in a new place confronts the protective memory of the way things were back home." (NYTimes' Uzodinma Iweala)

7. Midnight's Children by Salman Rushdie -- Mixing magic and mundane realism, Rushdie invites the reader into India during the period of transition from British colonialism to Indian independence in order to open us up to how Western ideals have shaped, for good and ill, modern India. Why read it? This is quintessential post-colonial lit.. Using Hindu gods and magical realism, Rushdie speaks to the creative and destructive forces at work in the world and which seep into the unequal power relations between imperial forces and colonial minions, between East and West, and how this world is still shaped by centuries of colonial dominion. 

8. Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut -- John, who goes by Jonah, is researching a book on what elite Americans were doing the day the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima on the island of San Lorenzo -- a quaint little dictatorship in the Caribbean. Unbeknownst to him as he sets off, this research will lead him to meet a fated group of people, come across the religion of Bokononism, and, unfortunately usher in the end of the world. Why read it? Because it's Kurt F***in' Vonnegut, that's why. Ever since I read "Harrison Bergeron" and that changed my life (thanks again, Mrs. Kelly), I can't get enough of this curse-laden, dystopic, short-story, satirical mad man. But this book in particular really gets me. It's a novella about human stupidity and its many manifestations in the realms of politics, sexuality, cultural elitism, capitalism, and religion. If you read it and don't like it, that probably means you understood it. 

9. The Bone People by Keri Hulme -- Technically a story about love, but also one about a woman locked away in a tower (go figure) the plot follows Kerewin Holmes, who is half Māori, half European (Pākehā), and her love interest and his son. Why read it? My best suggestion is to get drunk on New Zealand literature. Seriously, that place is stock-full of scintillating novels, poetry, and philosophy. Plus, their indigenous debates (between Māori and Pākehā) are some of the most robust, and constructive, in the world. Specifically, this book paints a picture of reconciliation between indigenous and Eurocentric powers that not only critiques colonial hegemony, but offers a pathway for both Māori and Pākehā to work together to achieve healing and unity for the future. 

10. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez -- Another magical realist novel, this is the saga of seven generations of the Buendía family in Macondo in Latin America. There are massacres, marriages, major corporations, misfortunes, and migrations. It's the story of Latin American history centering around one family and one city.  Why read it? It's dense, convoluted, and puzzling prose. Did I sell you yet? Every sentence, comma, and page turn mean something in this book. So it's not only an exercise in how to read a book, but it also initiates the reader into the soul, passion, and dashed dreams of many Latin Americans who fear that colonialism and corruption have fated them to a repeated history of could-have-been glory, lost love, and decay. 

*Honorable Mention: Faceless Killers by Henning Mankell -- The first story in the Wallander detective series, the plot follows the bleak, cold, investigation of a bloody murder of two farmers in the countryside. The only clue to the brutal crime? The attackers may be 'foreign.' When this leaks out, racial hatred is unleashed. Why read it? A) It's entertaining. B) It's going to make you question whether you're a racist or not...and you probably are. But, as one of the characters says, what really counts, "is what you do with [your racism]." 

This is my list. I could add more, I could change it up. For now, this is what it is. What would you add? What is your list? What are your thoughts? Share with me on the blog, via Facebook, or on Twitter with the hashtag #BookChallenge. 

In Religion and Culture, Missiology, Church Ministry Tags Ice Bucket Challenge, BookChallenge, Gospel Coalition, Books every Christian should read, Dr. Seuss, Justin Taylor, Invisible Man, Ralph Ellison, The Good Earth, Pearl S. Buck, The Poisonwood Bible, Barbara Kingsolver, That Hideous Strength, C.S. Lewis, Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad, Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart, post-colonial, subaltern voices, We Need New Names, NoViolet Bulawayo, Midnight's Children, Salman Rushdie, Cat's Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut, Harrison Bergeron, The Bone People, Keri Hulme, One Hundred Years of Solitude, Gabriel García Márquez
Comment

The Cathedral Basilica of St. Augustine, finished in 1797.

Religion in hellholes, citadels, & tourist traps

September 2, 2014

Religion is everywhere. It’s in our hearts and in our hands. We see it in coffee shops and on college campuses, on street corners and in the local mall. Religion is everywhere. 

It’s even found in deep sinkholes and picturesque beaches in Florida. 

This last weekend was Labor Day weekend and my in-laws were in town. Our plan consisted of taking them to a couple of local highlights: the Devil’s Millhopper and St. Augustine. What I did not plan for was the unexpected religious “sightings” that we would find there and have the opportunity to reflect on. These case studies in religious sightings are not only engaging, but provide direction for you to discover religion in unexpected places or on vacation! 

The shady sinkhole of The Devil's Millhopper and its waterfalls shelter eerie stories of demons, bones, and Indian princesses. 

The shady sinkhole of The Devil's Millhopper and its waterfalls shelter eerie stories of demons, bones, and Indian princesses. 

The Devil’s Millhopper is a local legend here in Gainesville and home to one of the most famous sinkholes in the state. Designated a National Natural Landmark and Florida State Park, the Devil’s Millhopper has been a curiosity enjoyed by tourists for over 100 years. It is not a large sinkhole, though it is an old one, formed in two stages about 10,000 and 1,000 years ago. It’s a pretty cool place, literally. The Devil’s Millhopper is not only interesting, but cooler at the bottom of its 236 steps because its basin is fed by at least twelve freshwater springs.


Researchers have unearthed a great deal of Florida’s natural history here, but it is the religious folklore surrounding the Millhopper that makes it peculiarly fascinating. 

Along with shark’s teeth and fossil remains, there have been some pre-historic human remains discovered in the bottom of the sink. Thus, while the name “millhopper” comes from the comparison of the round-bottomed pit with the bowls millers use to grind grain, it was these remains that helped give rise to the Millhopper’s malevolent moniker and the rumor that the sinkhole was feeding dead bodies to the devil. Local UF students and 

The Timucua, an American Indian people, whose territory included much of Northeast Florida and Southeast Georgia made up of 35 chiefdoms, have an origin myth for the Devil’s Millhopper that explains much of the above mythos. The story goes:

“There was a beautiful Indian princess who lived in a village in present-day Gainesville. The Devil wanted to marry the princess, but she wanted nothing to do with him. So one day, he kidnapped her and ran. On hearing this, all the Indian braves were deeply saddened and began to chase the Devil and the Indian princess. As the braves began to get closer and closer, the Devil retreated to his portal — the sinkhole — and the braves fell in (in some stories, he created the sinkhole). They fought against the quicksand and the Devil, but seeing that they were going to lose the battle they fell into retreat. When they tried to climb out, the Devil turned them to stone (in some versions he ate them and spit up their bones, explaining the pre-historic remains). To this day, it is said, that the running water of the springs is the weeping tears of the Indian braves, shed for the beautiful princess who was taken below to the Devil’s abode.”
— Adapted from Florida State Parks Authority

St. Augustine is a little slice of historical paradise on Florida’s Atlantic coast. Nicknamed “the Ancient City” it is the oldest existent, and continuously occupied European colonial city in the U.S., founded by the Spanish in 1565. 

Contested by the Spanish, British, and Americans over the centuries, St. Augustine bears the religious marks of all these influences: 

Memorial Presbyterian Church, built by Henry Flagler for his northern elite religionistas.

Memorial Presbyterian Church, built by Henry Flagler for his northern elite religionistas.

  • Nombre de Dios (Name of God) is a Spanish mission station with a distinguishing 204ft cross that was run by Jesuits and Franciscans during the Spanish area and saw some success in reaching out to Mocama and Agua Dulce peoples, both part of the aforementioned Timucua group.
  • There are significant churches including the Cathedral Basilica of St. Augustine (another National Historical Landmark, finished in 1797 after a period of Spanish revival following British rule); Trinity Church of St. Augustine (the oldest Protestant church in Florida with beautiful stained glass); and the Henry Flagler-era churches Grace United Methodist Memorial Presbyterian, and Ancient City Baptist (all built ornately to cater to the northern elite Flagler, a partner of John D. Rockefeller’s, attracted to St. Augustine). 
  • The most obvious landmark in St. Augustine, however, is Castillo San Marcos, a strategic fort for the Spanish, British, and Americans, which is home to the oldest chapel in the U.S. — St. Mark’s, in one of the theaters of the fortification.

The altar of St. Mark's Chapel in Castillo San Marcos, St. Augustine, FL.

With all this religious history, it might be easy to miss the subaltern voices of St. Augustine, the religious history of social groups who are socially, politically, and geographically outside of the dominant power structure of the colony (the Spanish, British, and American powers).

The Timucua are not the only people to feature in the religious, or native, history of Florida. Nor are the infamous Seminoles. And, unfortunately, if the story of the Devil and the Indian princess is only myth, there are far more diabolical stories about American Indians in the Sunshine State. Only, in these stories the Indians were thrown into hellholes in forts by U.S. soldiers.

An inscription of the Kiowa Sun Dance, engraved here my imprisoned Plains American Indians under U.S. forces at Castillo San Marcos, St. Augustine, FL. 

The casement immediately adjacent to St. Mark’s chapel at Castillo San Marcos is a nondescript coquina-walled room where several displays explain the American Indian history of the space. It is a disheartening room to experience, as U.S. forces imprisoned American Indians who resisted replacement and subjugation under the advance of American new-colonial forces. Imprisoned next to the citadel’s chapel, trapped in their own “Devil’s Millhopper,” these Kiowa and Southern Cheyenne men etched the dreams of their freedom into the walls even as they became a tourist trap to northerners vacationing in St. Augustine, including missionaries and teachers who tried to “help” them assimilate by teaching the prisoners English, Christianity, and other elements of “American” culture. 

A representation of the inscription above. 

Their religious graffiti featured the Kiowa Sun Dance — outlawed by the U.S. government. The Sun Dance was the premier religious ceremony for the Kiowas, similar to other plains Indian People. Typically, it was performed annually during the summer, and provided a time for ceremonial and religious celebration and supplication. It was also a socio-cultural re-union providing an opportunity for the sharing of news, healing, and self-renewal among kin. 

Engraving this into the walls, and performing it in the courtyard of the Castillo San Marcos, acted as a form of protest against their imprisonment and subjugation — especially since the Sun Dance was an agonizing ordeal for those who performed it and it in some way mirrored the torment of the imprisoned plains Indians. 

Then there is the Huguenot Cemetery, which recalls the slaughter of Huguenots in St. John — French Calvinists who fled to Florida to escape persecution in France — just 26 miles North of St. Augustine. 

These tragic testaments can make it seem as if the subaltern stories form St. Augustine are solely sad ones, but this is not always the case. 

Tourists traipsing down St. George Street are so easily drawn to the restaurants and shops there that it is easy to walk past the National Greek Orthodox Shrine of St. Photios without noticing it. 

The chapel, featuring Byzantine-style gold-leaf highlighted frescoes, at the Greek Orthodox National Shrine of St. Photios, St. Augustine, FL. 

The shrine is unique in the Western Hemisphere with its dozens of Byzantine frescoes, beautifully highlighted with gold leaf. Surrounded by the subdued sounds of chants used in the Greek Orthodox Church and a coolness that is a strange departure from the outside temperature, the visitor experience includes a walk down a candle-lit corridor to a beautiful grotto. 

But what is it doing in St. Augustine? According to the documentary video in the chapel, St. Augustine is Greek-Americans’ ‘Plymouth Rock.’ Forced out by poverty and land-locked farming scenarios from their Mediterranean home, the first Greeks to arrive in the New World came by ship to St. Augustine in 1768. From here, they traveled south to work as indentured servants at an indigo plantation. While they suffered there, they remember St. Augustine fondly and have enshrined it in their national psyche naming the chapel after St. Photios the Great, a 9th-century patriarch of Constantinople, the seat of power and nationalism for the Greek Orthodox. 

This beautiful shrine is open to the public, but very few enjoy its splendors or explore its history. The same goes for the Kiowa engraving or the Huguenot cemetery. Missing these subaltern sites means failing to see the whole story of a place, a time, and a people. 

What can you do to make sure you don’t miss the story? Open your eyes to the wonderful world of religious sightings, study up a little beforehand, and go spiritual site-seeing. 

You’ll be surprised what you find. 



In Religion and Culture, Religious Literacy Tags religious sites, religious pilgrimage, subaltern voices, religion is everywhere, St. Augustine, Florida, Devil's Millhopper, The Legend of the Devil's Millhopper, Gainesville, University of Florida, Nombre de Dios, St. Photios Shrine, Greek Orthodox, St. Mark's chapel, Castillo San Marcos, Kiowa, Kiowa Sun Dance, Sun Dance, Timucua, American Indians, Native Americans, Plains indians, Huguenots, Huguenot Cemetery
Comment

Oh Texas and your gaudy crosses...

The Christian Cross, Texan Identity, & "Tex-ianity"

August 28, 2014

Texas is Texas, that’s for sure, and even the Christian cross has come to reflect the peculiar qualities that elicit fierce loyalty and identity from locals and both fascination and aversion from outsiders. But what makes Texas, “Texas?” And, consequently what makes Texans ingrain their culture in their crosses? Texans garner these attitudes and convictions from a history of rugged independence and a pride of their roots formed on ranches and fields that bring forth cotton, cattle, oil, politicians and football stars. There is an unwavering devotion to the Texan way of life, to what Randolph B. Campbell has called “personal liberty, rampant individualism, and admiration for the superrich.”

Although in general, the cross is a symbol of suffering and an icon of redemption and victory through pain and death, in Texas, the cross serves as a symbol of freedom, ingenuity, rough-and-tumble independence and strength.

READ MORE AT SACRED MATTERS - A SCHOLAR BLOG OF EMORY UNIVERSITY

In Religion and Culture Tags Cross, Christian, Religious symbology, Texan identity, Texas A&M, Rob Bell, Rudolph Campbell, Emory University, Sacred Matters, Ken Chitwood
Comment

Photo: Susan Katz Miller

What's it like to 'be both?' An interview with interfaith family pioneer, researcher, Susan Katz Miller

August 26, 2014

Every day, Americans interact with an increasing number of people from different faiths. With Mormon neighbors, Hindu co-workers, and non-religious friends, it is unsurprising to see a growing number of interfaith marriages in the United States. Indeed, Naomi Schaeffer Riley reported that just less than half (42%) of marriages in the U.S. are interfaith ones. Regardless of geographic location, sex, educational status, or income level interfaith marriages are on the rise. 

Susan Katz Miller's book Being Both: Embracing Two Religions in One Interfaith Family -- a book that famed author, and interfaith pioneer, Reza Aslan called, "a gorgeous and inspiring testament to the power of love...." -- was written with this growing demographic, and their families, in mind. 

*Pick up the NEW paperback copy of Being Both on pre-order (Oct. 21)

It also speaks to those who are in mono-religious, or non-religious, relationships. For those who  married within their own faith group Being Both introduces another world often judged, and nudged to the margins, by monochromatic religious insiders who look down upon interfaith unions. Odds are, however, that even if you married someone from your own religion, you are related to, or know, someone from an interfaith background and you may be interested in the dynamics at work or wondering how you might best bless your loved ones in an appropriate, and knowledgable, way. Miller's book is an easy opportunity to apperceive the blessings, and challenges, presented to interfaith families. For religious leaders, such as pastors, imams, rabbis, etc. it challenges them to consider a "pastoral theology" for interfaith families. For academics, it presents areas for further research. While Miller conducted her own survey, she suggests the field is ripe for more in-depth quantitative and qualitative study. 

Miller speaks from her own interfaith experience and thus maintains a positive tone throughout. The interfaith maven covers a wide breadth of concerns from interfaith family communities to coming of age ceremonies for interfaith children and their eventual religious outlook during adulthood. The book focuses specifically on Jewish-Christian relationships and is limited in scope when it comes to other mixed marriages with people from Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, non-religious, or other religious backgrounds. However, as Miller notes, she eagerly awaits the publication of other titles that explore the many varieties of interfaith families.

I had the opportunity to ask Miller some follow-up questions about religious fluidity, furthering the interfaith family conversation, and the future of interfaith communities in the U.S. Her answers are worth a long look: 

*For more on religion & culture, follow Ken on Twitter

 

You wrote, “[C]hildren, whether or not they are interfaith children, go out into this world and make their own religious choices.” That freaks some people out, why don't you think people should be scared?

Photo: Susan Katz Miller

Americans are switching denominations and religions at a significant rate, and leaving behind formal affiliation to become “spiritual but not religious,” according to Pew Research. That is the reality of our current flexible and fluid religious landscape, in a country with freedom of religious affiliation. If you want your children to have a particular religious identity, your best strategy is to raise them with that singular identity. So if both parents agree that they want to raise the child in that religion, fine, go for it. But if you have two religions represented in the family, or one religion and one secular worldview, my point is that you cannot simply ignore the second worldview. This child grows up knowing and loving people with two different sets of practices, two belief systems. I believe that this gives them a certain proclivity for universalism, bridge-building, and peacemaking, which I see as an advantage in life, and good for the world. Our complex world is now interconnected by media and internet, shrinking rapidly in terms of our ability to interact in real time. Children who span the traditional cultural, ethnic, racial and religious boundaries have a head start in becoming the cultural translators and diplomats who can help us to make this complex world a peaceful one. 

What’s been the reception of the book?  

This has been a year filled with exhilarating conversations. I have spoken to rooms packed with parents, with college students, with interfaith dialogue groups, and to a room filled with almost 50 rabbis. I’m in dialogue with ministers and priests, Muslims and Hindus. I would love to visit every seminary in America, because clergy need to be prepared for pastoral counseling of the growing segment of interfaith families. And college chaplains, in particular, are looking for tools to help support students with complex religious identities, or in complex religious relationships. I can help provide those tools. Most of all, I am heartened by the fact that Jewish communities are beginning to reconsider the strategy of ignoring the 25% of intermarried Jewish parents raising children “partly Jewish and partly something else.” These are not families rejecting Judaism: they are families who want to stay connected. For instance, this year the venerable Jewish Daily Forward invited me to be on a roster of experts for their new interfaith families advice column, alongside more conservative viewpoints. 

How can someone who is not involved in an interfaith relationship better interact with interfaith communities and create an environment that does not marginalize them?

I would say, try to see that human beings, all of us, have complex religious identities. None of us fit easily into single-label boxes. Even if you strongly identify as, say, Presbyterian, you may or may not agree on various religious beliefs or practices with your neighbor in the pew. Each of us constructs our own religious and spiritual (or humanist) identities out of our family backgrounds, our encounters with the natural world, with literature and religious texts, with other people. People from interfaith families are no different in this regard. We simple start out with a broader range of family influences.

What is the first step for families who are interfaith who want to be more pro-active?

A couple getting married starts from a shared platform of love and respect, and ideally they have had deep conversations and have a shared position on the religious and spiritual life of their family going forward. Unfortunately, often it is the extended family, who may have less intimate experience with people from other religions, who put on pressure about the wedding, about the education and identity of future children, etc. Everyone in this situation needs to work hard to continue to encounter each other out of a place of love, rather than fear and defensiveness. Ideally, rather than a retreat to avoiding each other, spend time with extended family, sharing holiday celebrations and religious rituals without pressuring anyone to convert or to choose a particular pathway for the children.

What are the greatest promises, and challenges, facing interfaith families at the present moment? 

As interfaith families, we represent the extraordinary religious freedom and ability to bridge social boundaries in America today. This is both a promise and a challenge. My own experience, as part of a happy three-generation family, is tremendously positive. The challenge is mainly in explaining my happiness to people, mainly baby boomers and older people, who tell me “you can’t do that.” I find that young people, Millennials and in particular the newer “Generation Z,” often come from complex family backgrounds, and have a more intuitive understanding of religious complexity. 

Some may counter, “isn’t saying someone is “interfaith” like starting a new religion all its own valuing pluralism and tolerance, worshipping some polytheistic amalgamation of gods? Isn’t saying something is ‘both’ just some trumped up form of ‘buffet style religion?’” Respond.

Interfaith is not a religion: there is no specific interfaith theology, or required set of practices. Interfaith is a state of being that results from marriage into, or birth into, an extended interfaith family. The communities that have grown up to support interfaith families provide a way to stay connected to both religions, to teach children the history and texts of both, and to allow them the opportunity to experience religious rituals, when they may or may not be welcomed or feel comfortable in more traditional houses of worship. These communities also provide a place where families can experience their interfaith status as positive, rather than feeling marginalized.

Your book focuses predominately on Jewish-Christian interfaith families. You say you look forward to the books to be written from other interfaith combinations, but you wrote, “each religious recombination creates unique challenges and unique synergies.” Talk a little more about that.

I did interview interfaith couples including Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist practices, so in that chapter of my book you get a glimpse of some of the ways these interfaith families work. What stays the same is the essential role of respect, educating each other and sharing in ritual together, and working to maintain positive relationships with extended family. I can recommend three books that have been published already. The Book of Mormon Girl by Joanna Brooks on a Mormon and Jewish family, Saffron Cross by J. Dana Trent on a Hindu and Christian family, and a new book, In Faith and In Doubt by Dale McGowan, on Christian and secular humanist families. 

What’s the next step in the field of researching interfaith families and interfaith communities?

My book was the first to survey and interview interfaith children raised with intentional interfaith educations. I think the results are tantalizing, and largely reassuring in terms of refuting the idea that interfaith children raised with “both” will be confused. But I am really hoping that academics now follow up with larger and longer studies on the spiritual and religious journeys of these children. 

For many readers, this is their first experience with the concept of an interfaith community. Break down an interfaith community’s core vision, purpose in three points:

An interfaith families community:

What does a Jewish-Christian family do in December -- when both Christmas and Hanukkah are celebrated? The answer can nurture children towards greater religious appreciation later in life. 

  1. Provides a “third space” in which neither spouse is a “guest,” and couples can deepen their knowledge of and respect for both religions.
  2. Provides an interfaith education for interfaith children, so that they can study the histories, texts, beliefs and practices of both family religions in a program staffed with a Jewish and a Christian teacher in each classroom.
  3. Provides a space for interfaith families to celebrate holidays together, talk about their experiences, and nurture children who feel positive about being part of an interfaith family.

You talk about the promise of religious "interfaith identity and practice" for individuals, the pitfalls for religious institutions. Expand on that. 

Many American religious institutions are struggling to maintain membership and affiliation, in an era when people are choosing to be spiritual but not religious, or choosing to be neither. Ideally, families raising children with intentional interfaith education would be able to affiliate with two religious institutions, for instance a synagogue and a church, in addition to an interfaith families community, rather than feeling that they are welcome in none. It is really up to these religious institutions to decide whether or not they are willing to accept children who are being educated about both family religions. When these families are welcomed, the couple benefits, the children benefit, and the institution benefits both in terms of getting bodies into the pews, and in terms of bringing the reality of our interfaith 21st century world into the conversation.

*For more on religion & culture, follow Ken on Twitter

 

In Religion, Religion and Culture Tags Interfaith, Interfaith families, Being Both, Susan Katz Miller, Ken Chitwood, Eboo Patel, Reza Aslan
Comment

Now writing for The Gainesville Sun

August 25, 2014

I was honored to write my first piece for The Gainesville Sun, the local newspaper here in "The Swamp" -- Gainesville, FL. 

My first piece focused on the installation of a new parish pastor -- Rev. Marek Dzien -- at St. Augustine Catholic Church. 

READ IT HERE.

In Religion News Tags St. Augustine Catholic Church, Gainesville, The Gainesville Sun, Fr. Marek Dzien, Ken Chitwood
1 Comment

"Black Jesus" premiered on Adult Swim August 7th, 2014 - just three days before peaceful protests and riots broke out in Ferguson, MO over the shooting of Michael Brown

Jesus in strange places: ‘Black Jesus’ & understanding religion & race on the margins

August 21, 2014

Every once and a while Jesus shows up in strange places. 

The first time I saw Jesus appear in a peculiar place was as an adolescent at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) thanks to my friend Birghapati, a Hare Krishna. Upon discovering I was a Christian, Birghapati opened up the book The Hidden Glory of India to share with me how Jesus, after surviving his crucifixion, traveled to India, learned under a guru, and taught there for several years. The section on “the lost years of Jesus in India” was only two pages, but in that short chapter was an entire universe of problems, possibilities, and peculiarities for me to fathom. 

Encountering Jesus in a strange place thrust me into a world of healthy, albeit challenging, questions, which in turn spurred my personal spiritual progress and taught me much about religion at the margins. Your own experience of Jesus in a strange place could prompt your own discovery or, if contemplated in a community, a group’s grasping of the nature, and reality, of Jesus — even as he appears in strange places.  

With the proliferation of new media sources (television shows, podcasts, webpages, social media sites), Jesus pops up everywhere and millions of people see him, or hear about him, in a relatively short period of time. He appears on hospital windows, spaghetti dinners, in Middle Eastern dreams, and in newly syndicated TV shows like “Black Jesus” — a scripted comedy on Cartoon Network’s “Adult Swim” from “The Boondocks” creator Aaron McGruder. 

Each time Jesus materializes there is undoubtedly controversy concerning orthodoxy and who has the authority to adjudicate Jesus’ authentic appearances and presence. But, what if instead of immediately denouncing these outlier apparitions of Jesus, we all took the opportunity to ask a few relevant questions? 

To get a grasp of what I’m going for here (and before you immediately denounce me as a heretic), let’s look at the case of “Black Jesus.” The comedy show centers on a black Jesus Christ living in contemporary Compton. His mission is to spread a gospel of kindness in “the hood” with his modern-day disciples. In the first episode, Jesus gets busted for smoking pot, only to escape being charged by transforming the marijuana into garden salad (playing off Jesus’ miracle of turning water into wine in John 2: 1-11, no doubt). 

It is easy to see how many Christians could be offended by such a portrayal of their Messiah. Likewise, many African-Americans may be affronted by the stereotypes that are thrust onto a “black Jesus” who, instead of being a rousing Messiah, proves “a lazy, unemployable drug-user.” Indeed, choruses of complaint have been raised by both constituencies in the wake of the show’s recent release. 

*For more on religion and culture, follow Ken on Twitter

At the same time, there are commentators and cultural pundits who are laying blasphemy and bigotry aside to ask “what can we learn from ‘Black Jesus’?” Chandra Johnson wrote in The Deseret News National:

After the collective denunciation among faith groups of Adult Swim's new show "Black Jesus," which spawned a handful of Change.org petitions, some are trying to glean deeper meaning from the show. 

Now, how does this question, and others that must precede, and proceed from, it help us learn more about Jesus and religion at the margins? Here are five questions that can prompt a healthy discussion when Jesus shows up in an unexpected place:

1. Where (and when)? 

The first question(s) to ask is “where does this come from?” and, subsequently, “when did this appearance first happen?” The social locatedness of a spiritual encounter is paramount in understanding what such an appearance can reveal about the people experiencing it and concerning the experience itself. 

Take, for example, the various manifestations of the Virgin Mary (La Virgen) in indigenous contexts across Latin America. In Guadalupe, she co-mingles indigenous heritage with Catholic religion and becomes the symbol of a new mestizaje — a new world Mexican religious and cultural identity. Then in San Juan, she bridges and permeates borders between national identities, civil rights entities, multicultural institutions and various ethnicities. Wherever La Virgen appears, she is speaking to the culture’s need to bridge the traditional and the contemporary and to give birth to something new, salvific, and powerful, yet tender. 

So what does it mean when “Black Jesus” shows up on Adult Swim? Perhaps we would best first ask “when?” This “Black Jesus” is not the first black Jesus. He comes at the end of a long line of artistic depictions of Jesus influenced by culture, political, and theological circumstances. Jesus has been depicted as black — either as African or African American — for centuries. Notably, the “Black Christ” movement helped identify Jesus’ suffering with the struggle of African Americans in the U.S. who were fighting for equality and acceptance in their own nation. Wherever Jesus has appeared as “black” he has been viewed as associating, identifying, and commiserating with those who feel oppressed because of the color of their skin. 

2. Who (and when again)? 

What does this mean, then, when “Black Jesus” is introduced to the Adult Swim audience? What is the significance of those to whom Jesus now appears? What does this tell us? 

Adult Swim’s audience is not predominately “black.” In fact, its typical viewers’ ethnic make up is almost two-thirds “white” (62%), with a third “black” (27%), and otherwise Hispanic or “Other” (11%). 

Perhaps this “Black Jesus” is introducing the concept of the “Black Christ” as liberator to an audience who is generally, or wholly, unfamiliar with this liberating figure of the marginalized and downtrodden. Or, possibly, its being used as a comedic foil and is seeking to be offensive for offense’ (and ratings’) sake.

3. Why? 

ldzn6ynz24qdkyfwbtpm.jpg

And this unveils the important question of “why this ‘Black Jesus?’” Aaron McGruder is no rank-and-file comedian solely seeking laughs and high marks. He is a social commentator who formerly used his characters on “The Boondocks” to speak to pertinent issues in politics and culture. He did so with a young African-American voice, “one that never backed down with his satire in the face of criticism and one that showed we weren’t just a materialistic, money-hungry generation…” but one that cared about the political and social issues of the nation, and world, at large. 

Conceivably, McGruder and the Adult Swim team are not only making Jesus funny, and cool, for their white, hipster-fied, demographic, they are also introducing a distinctly “black” voiced Jesus into the “wide world of white” to peel back the surface and expose the nitty-gritty, real-world, issues that the African-American population in the U.S. deals with on a daily basis.

4. What? 

This leads to the central question that those who seek to grow from their encounter with “Black Jesus” are asking — “what can we learn from this show?” 

Comedy, especially when it is offensive, pushes boundaries of what is acceptable in society in order to transgress the current cultural order and be a trailblazer for change.

As The Deseret News National shared, 

minister Christopher House took a different tact entirely on The Huffington Post, saying the show was an opportunity for Christian reflection. ‘Identification precedes personal, spiritual and social salvation,’ House wrote. ‘Rather than simply dismissing the show as being blasphemous, maybe we should continue to watch with an awareness of contemporary issues and a strong sense of irony. To do so would ask us to consider what then does it mean to have a black Jesus living and moving in impoverished black spaces?’ 

To see how relevant, and important, that question, and “Black Jesus,” can be, look no further than #Ferguson. McGruder could not have foreseen the future, but the timing of the release of “Black Jesus” could likewise not have come at a more (in)convenient time. As our nation wrestles with racial stereotypes and spills blood and sparks fires on the streets of St. Louis, “Black Jesus” no longer seems a laughing matter, but one of serious contemporary import. That “Black Jesus” is on view on a network that appeals predominately to “Whites” might be the most consequential element of this manifestation.

5. How? 

But how can all of this even be possible? How can it be the case that Jesus can be morphed, co-opted, reshaped, and re-cast in so many cultural, religious, and political molds?

Without delving into the debate about the veracity of the various ethnic and cultural portrayals of Jesus throughout the ages, this latest likeness of Christ testifies to the continually potent, and potentially problematic, “translation principle” proposed and popularized by Lamin Sanneh. 

In his book Translating the Message: The Missionary Impact on Culture and several other essays and works, Yale scholar Sanneh expounded upon the idea that “translation” is embedded in the Christian message, and particularly the life and ministry of Jesus. From a missionary perspective, “Christianity is recognizable only in the embodied idioms and values of the cultures in which we find it,” Sanneh wrote in Global Theology in Evangelical Perspective. There is much potential here, as the “the receiving culture [becomes] the decisive destination of God’s salvific promise….” However, there is also inherent danger, as “mission as translation” commits to a bold and radical step that may lead to the “muddying of the waters” and leave Jesus at the mercy of various “cultural makeovers.” This leads to contested theories of who, and what, Jesus was and is. 

Ever since he was born, the masses have argued over who Jesus is and who he claimed to be.  There are many contemporary voices that make the claim to authenticity in a religiously, ethnically, and culturally diverse world. Who has the claim to say that their Jesus is the correct Jesus? Who doesn’t have that authority? Is “Black Jesus” an authentic Jesus? These are good questions to wrestle with in your community.

As the debate rages on what can be gleaned are the following points: 

  • Taking a step back to ask hard questions about “Black Jesus” allows for us to learn more about how people view Jesus and what is inherently “translatable” about him. 
  • It also permits us the opportunity to view religion from the margins and associate with religious, and cultural, “others” whose ethnic, social, or political locus may be wholly unfamiliar to us.
  • Finally, we can use these above questions and guidelines to ask similar questions of other spiritual experiences and manifestations. When the Virgin Mary appears on toast, Krishna becomes a superhero, the Buddha is found in the butcher shop, or the Qur’an is hung on the wall for an art installation we can ask the significance of where this has shown up; to whom it appeared; why to them, in this place, at this time; what does it mean; and how is this even possible. 

Perhaps these points will not lead us to “truth,” but instead to a deeper understanding of the multifaceted and complex ways that people experience the sacred mystically, sacramentally, and prophetically in a media-rich and multi-religious world. Often, these experiences are not “authentic” in that they conform to the orthodox code, but they are authentic insofar as they are experienced. So that begs the question of why they are experienced and what that means for the religion for which they bear the most consequence.

In this instance, “Black Jesus” has appeared and we have experienced the phenomenon. What does this tell us about Jesus? What does this tell us about "us?" What can we learn, and apply, from this manifestation whether it be authentic or heretical, comedic or blasphemous?

*For more on religion and culture, follow Ken on Twitter

In Religion and Culture Tags Black Jesus, Ferguson, Black Christ, Adult Swim, Aaron McGruder, Ken Chitwood, Jesus appears, spiritual experience, prophetic
4 Comments

Invoking Dumbledore when tragedy strikes: Dealing with death through postmodern parables

August 14, 2014

In a society that is increasingly post-religious and secular, how do we cope with senseless tragedy and death? Who do we invoke to assuage our anguish? In some cases we still might cling to the concept of God or seek the salvific intervention of some compassionate saint or bodhisattva. Other times, we may look to canonized characters from the realm of fantasy fiction. 

On July 9th, 2014 Stephen and Katie Stay, along with four of their five children, were murdered in their Houston-area home. Their daughter Cassidy, 15, was the sole survivor who, according to family, police, and media, “heroically” called 911 and gave details to authorities that led to the capture of the suspect just minutes later. 

Certainly, what happened to the Stay family was an absurd tragedy. In the wake of such senseless slaughter neighbors, family, friends, international authors and celebrities, and the nation as a whole rallied around Cassidy. A gathering was held to raise support for her as she coped with losing her family. Religious invocations and undercurrents were omnipresent at the event, which is understandable given the otherworldly nature of tragedy and the family’s membership in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (a.k.a. “LDS” or “Mormon Church”). 

Stay’s grandfather, Roger Lyons, spoke at the memorial before Cassidy and mentioned the support of their LDS church and community and clinging “to the hope of life.” He then invoked his faith’s founder — Joseph Smith — alluding to his persecution, trials, and contemplation of “the sting of death” and the baptism of the dead, and quoted him:

“now what do we hear in the Gospel which we have received? A voice of gladness, a voice of mercy from heaven, and a voice of truth out of the earth. Glad tidings for the dead. A voice of gladness for the living and the dead. Glad tidings of great joy. Shall we not go on in so great a cause? Go forward and not backward. Courage brethren, and on, on, to the victory! Let your hearts rejoice and be exceedingly glad. Let the mountains shout for joy and all ye valleys cry aloud and let all the sons of God shout for joy!”
— Doctrine & Covenants 128:19ff

When Cassidy stood to speak, she did not quote The Book of Mormon, The Bible, or any other sacred text of the LDS church, but instead she invoked Albus Dumbledore, the revered and sagely headmaster from Harry Potter’s Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry:

“Happiness can be found, even in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
— Cassidy Stay, quoting Albus Dumbledore

While not downplaying these horrible circumstances and extending compassion, without judgment, to Ms. Stay and her family, this episode invites consideration of the role of myth in the 21st-century West. This post is a consideration of how in the wake of catastrophe, and in dealing with death, in a religiously pluralistic culture, we not only look to traditional spiritual sources for solace, but also to “post-modern parables” and modern, “profane,” myths such as Harry Potter.

Throughout history, humans have composed, compiled, and communicated myths, stories, and parables to convey perceptions of deep and abiding truths concerning the human condition. In many societies, these myths were explicitly religious and part of the plausibility structure of a culture and its ethos that helped members of the community deal with anomy — or chaotic events and circumstances — such as death. Myths proved a powerful vehicle for dealing with cosmic questions and often shaped the lives and rituals of the people who told them or wrote them down for posterity. Indeed, in many ways, stories are part of what it means to be human and, especially, to be human in community.

In today’s world, myths are not always religious per se, but serve similar functions. While they may play off religious themes (we all remember studying the biblical references made in famous British and American literature classics we all read in high school), modern stories do not necessarily, or directly, invoke “the gods” in order to sneak past, or perchance to slay, the “watchful dragons” that C.S. Lewis referred to in discussing the power of fairy tales. 

Reading, whether religious or secular, continues to play a central role in American religious practice and community building. Indeed, much of modern day literature is an attempt to provide formative stories to help explain the human condition and build community, albeit loosely, around contemporary fiction. Look no further than the cathedral of literary sodality — the book club. 

Lamenting the fact that so many books are inherently depressive when it comes to the modern human condition and, in fact, disdainful of moral communities and spiritual institutions, Kristen D. Randle wrote this reflection, “the world seems to be going through some kind of accelerated social and moral entropy, a dissolving of the kind of cultural and moral bonds that make and keep a community.” She called for hopeful stories, particularly in the realm of young adult literature, that would beckon youth and children beyond death and decay and into life, and faith (although not explicitly religious or divine faith). 

Enter Harry Potter. J.K. Rowling, who to her credit sent a letter “from Dumbledore” to Ms. Stay, crafted such a hopeful narrative when she penned the Potter series. Not only did this story invite readers into a fanciful world of magic and mystery, but it beckoned them to consider life, death, community, sacrifice, and the eternal battle between good and evil. Unabashedly, Rowling spun together Christian and post-modern spiritual themes to great effect. In the words of one commenter, in a post-Christian world Rowling re-articulated “the themes of religion in fresh and original ways” that are accessible to all, regardless of religious background. The series not only created fanfare, and garnered much economic success, but created community — replete with gatherings, pilgrimages, and rituals. 

Effectively, albeit unintentionally, Rowling created a non-sectarian, non-institutional, secular-but-still-spiritual “little religion.” A “little religions” is what Mircea Eliade said modern humanity turns to as a “pseudo religion,” but with its concomitant symbols can still provide “a religious vision of the world” that enables the non-religious “modern man” to open up his individual experience to bear fruit in the universal. As Eliade wrote, “Whether modern man ‘kills’ time with a detective story or enters such a foreign temporal universe as is represented by any novel, reading projects him out of his personal duration and incorporates him into other rhythm, makes him live in another ‘history.’” These stories are the narratives of “camouflaged” religious myths. 

The transcendence, resurrection, and corporate salvation we may no longer wish to find in institutional religion, we now seek in “post-modern parables” like Harry Potter, The Chronicles of Narnia, The Lord of the Rings, or The Hunger Games. 

This is all very similar to the journey of a young man who used magical seer stones to discern hidden messages on golden plates in the hills of New York in the early 19th-century. Joseph Smith was uncertain about the religious choices of his day, the institutional offerings of access to the transcendent and the divine, and so he sought the magnificence of the spiritual world in his own visions and writings. So too, have generations of Mormons who followed his words and attempted to establish their own spiritual community — Zion — on earth. 

When dealing with tragic events such as natural disasters, genocides, or family murders it seems our post-modern search is not limited to what is already available or offered by institutional religion and their attendant myths, stories, and parables. If we cannot find what we are looking for in these traditional sources, we increasingly invoke other stories, and their characters, such as Albus Dumbledore, to help us cope with the chaos of death. 

*This blog entry does not wish to make any statements concerning Cassidy Stay's religion or convey any judgment on her experience. Instead, it seeks to use the anecdotal note from the memorial event and make comments related to general religious and spiritual culture in the U.S.

Works Referenced:

Barned-Smith, St. John. “Harry Potter author reaches out to survivor of Spring family shooting.” The Houston Chronicle, August 6, 2014, http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Stay-family-thanks-community-for-donations-says-5681733.php (accessed August 14, 2014). 

Butler, John, Grant Wacker, and Randal Balmer. Religion in American Life: A Short History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Caldecott, Leonie. “Christian themes in Harry Potter: A wizard’s mission.” Christian Century (January 2008): 24-27. 

Click2Houston. “Cassidy Stay, grandfather speak at Celebration of Life event.” http://www.click2houston.com/news/cassidy-stay-grandfather-speak-at-celebration-of-life-event/26923030 (accessed August 13, 2014). 

Cunningham, Lawrence S. et. al. The Sacred Quest: An Invitation to the Study of Religion (2nd Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.

Granger, John. “Harry Is Here to Stay.” Christianity Today (July 2011): 50-53

Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt Publishing Co., 1959. 

Lewis, C. S. “Sometimes fairy stories may say best what's to be said.” New York Times. http://search.proquest.com/docview/113700480?accountid=9784 (accessed August 14, 2014). 

Randle, Kristen D. “Young Adult Literature: Let It Be Hope.” The English Journal 90, no. 4 (March 2001): 125-130. 

Ronald, Emily K. “More than ‘Alone with the Bible’: Reconceptualizing Religious Reading.” Sociology of Religion 73, no. 3 (February 2012): 323-344.

 

 

 

 

 

In Religion and Culture Tags Cassidy Stay, Dumbledore, Harry Potter, religion, myths, symbols, stories, narratives, Mircea Eliade, little religions, Houston Chronicle, Ken Chitwood, Joseph Smith, Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, Baptism of the dead
Comment
← Newer Posts Older Posts →
Latest Writing RSS
Name *
Thank you!

Fresh Tweets

Tweets by kchitwood

Latest Writing RSS

RELIGION | REPORTING | PUBLIC THEOLOGY